Brown Sherbert v. The agreement allowed Scardina, should she want, to pursue her own civil action against Masterpiece. FEC Randall v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. South Carolina United Mine Workers v.
Hodges inand a corporation's freedom of speech in his majority opinion for Citizens United v. Reynolds v.
And anyone at the wedding, argues the Justice Department, could easily assume that Phillips approves of the union by agreeing to make the cake. Roxanne Roberts. The couple went to the Colorado Civil Rights Division, which accused Phillips of discrimination based on sexual orientation.
This is particularly important today, inwhen people of color are still experiencing persistent and widespread discrimination while they shop, eat, or access cake maker fined for denying same sex cake in Dudley public spaces. It will be argued on Tuesday. Evans inLawrence v. Waggoner added, "Creative professionals who serve all people should be free to create art consistent with their convictions without the threat of government punishment.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote another opinion, concurring in part and concurring in judgment, joined by Gorsuch. Longstanding Colorado state law prohibits public accommodations, including businesses such as Masterpiece Cakeshop, from refusing service based on factors such as race, sex, marital status or sexual orientation.
Insame-sex couple Charlie Craig and David Mullins from Colorado made plans to be lawfully married in Massachusetts and return to Colorado to celebrate with their family and friends.
City of Paterson Graham Wallace v. Time, Inc.